Thursday, October 07, 2004

It's a Beautiful Day in the Neighborhood. Today's Topic is Strategy.

Hello neighbor. I'm so glad that you could join me today. Today we are going to talk about strategy. Can you say "strategy?" Nice try.

Let's go over to Picture Picture and look at a picture of the Middle East. (Piano music plays...)

RATS, kids! Picture Picture is broken. We were going to look at a really neat picture of the Middle East for me to help us talk about strategy. That makes me sad. Do you feel sad sometimes? Too bad! Well, since Picture Picture is broke, go find your home globe or world atlas. Can you say atlas? Didn't think so.

Now that you have found a map, turn to the part that shows the landmass between Israel and India. You may want to get a couple of sticky notes or some gold stars to mark the areas that I am about to point out.

Have you got all of that together? Good. Now that we have all of our supplies, lets see if we can have a little fun!

After the attacks on the World Trade Center in New York and the Pentagon in Washington, DC President Bush committed troops to Afghanistan to oust the Taliban regime. Find Afghanistan on your map and put a star there. Good!

(OK. I'm tired of the Mr. Rogers thing. Switching to normal writing.)

Once we had stabilized Afghanistan, we turned our attention to Iraq. We ended up attacking Iraq for a number of reasons: 1) Saddam had been violating numerous UN resolutions for 12 years. 2) Saddam would not let the UN weapons inspectors do their jobs. 3) Iraq was a state sponsor of terrorism, paying the families of suicide bombers in "palestine" $25,000 when their loved ones blew themselves (and usually a busload of children) to meet their Maker. 4) Iraq was a sanctuary for terrorists. (Abu Nidal and Zarkawi.) 5) Corruption was rife in Iraq and it is almost certain that money laundered through the Oil for Food program was given to terrorists and 6) all of the world's intelligence community indicated that Saddam had weapons of mass destruction. Put a gold star on Iraq.

Israel is one of our greatest (and before the two aforementioned wars, our only) ally in the Middle East. They have consistently been able to whip the tails of every country that ever was stupid enough to attack them. Put a gold star on Israel.

The United States Navy can go anywhere in the world where there is sufficient water. Please place stars on the Mediterranean Sea and the Persian Gulf.

In the Middle East, which countries are the greatest sponsors of terror? The two that come immediately to mind are Syria and Iran. Of course there are hotbeds of terrorists in Egypt, "palestine" and Saudi Arabia too. Please note where the gold stars are. Because of the military action that we have taken, the United States is in an excellent position to project its power throughout the Middle East. Any uprising of the anti-Islamic movement in Iran will be easily supported from our bases in Iraq and Afghanistan. With US Naval control of these areas it will not be necessary to secure air space permission from other countries in order to project our forces or support Iranian insurgent forces.

Now turn to the West. Look at the positioning of American troops and allies. Syria lies between Israel and Iraq. Once again, projection of force is a moot point.

You can rest assured that this fact hasn't slipped by even our other Arab, er, allies. It is interesting how interested the Saudis have become in the war on terror since the invasion of Iraq was completed. It is also interesting how cooperative they have been supplying oil since then.

What I believe we see developing is a very real strategy in the War on Terror. We are actually seeing a deployment of our forces to facilitate the enforcement of this war. No one has been talking about it. Why on earth would they? You certainly don't want to tell the enemy what you are doing. I just find our placement striking.

It is interesting that John Kerry and Wonderboy Edwards don't seem to grasp the strategic significance of our placement... interesting, but not surprising, since their grand strategy in the war on terror is to do what the President is doing - but do it better! They want to give the Iranians nuclear material so that they can prove that they aren't trying to make a bomb with it, and they want to pass a global test before they wage war against threats to American security.

As I said earlier, Mr. Cheney disclosed alot about the mindset of the Bush Administration when he defended the war in Iraq as a war that is not against Al Qaeda, but a war against terrorists and state sponsors of terror. Look at the stars! They tell the story!

5 comments:

Anonymous said...

Well...
....you said: (..)"After the attacks on the World Trade Center in New York and the Pentagon in Washington, DC President Bush committed troops to Afghanistan to oust the Taliban regime. (..)

Taliban regime is ousted but you didn't mention that the war on terrorism was also the make the world a safer place, to catch Osama and to destroy Al Qaeda. And nothing of this has happened. Now there are more terror over Iraq, Europe, Africa, Asia, Saudi Arabia and others. Something has to be done but is it going in a good track?

You can put a star over Iraq, and you are right when you said Saddan has violeted UN resolutions and paid 25.000 dollars to palestine terrorist families; but you are wrong when you said Iraq was a sanctuary of terrorists, when you said UN weapon inspectors did not make their jobs well, and when you did not say that the big mistake was made by the american and britty intelligence community. You were bad informed by the burocracy of your government an you are paying for it.

Well, I do believe Israel has the expertise to treat with terrorism. But they don't have the same to "deal" with the palestinians, and the whole world, to build a road to the peace.

If you really believe USA must support militar insurgence on Iran you don't know nothing about whats going on out there. The internal opposition would do (and are doing) the job very better and closer to a democratic solution.

Well, I belive that the whole world must fight against states sponsors of terror, and america is a protagonist in this fight, but first we have to tell the true to the people and then present results with our "strategy".

Anonymous said...
This comment has been removed by a blog administrator.
Jonathan said...

Welcome to Xs and Os Anon...

You wrote, "Taliban regime is ousted but you didn't mention that the war on terrorism was also the make the world a safer place, to catch Osama and to destroy Al Qaeda. And nothing of this has happened. Now there are more terror over Iraq, Europe, Africa, Asia, Saudi Arabia and others."

My intention in this post was not to discuss the other aspects of the war on terror. However, since you have brought it up, I would agree that these are goals of the war on terror. However, I totally disagree with your claims that the world is not a safer place and that we have not been accomplishing these goals. The world IS a safer place. As the President said, it isn't safe yet, but it is SAFER.

First of all, Saddam Hussein is no longer in power. We found out from the report that came out this week that Saddam was actively working to have the sanctions removed from his country and that he was merely waiting for the pressure that had been on him to be eased. Once that pressure was removed from him, he had full intentions of restarting his WMD programs. No Saddam = safer world.

A second outcome of the war on terror has been that Libya has voluntarily ended its WMD programs and is now cooperating to this end. No Libyan support of WMDs and terror = safer world.

A third outcome of the war on terror is that Afghanistan is no longer a state that sponsors terrorists. Terrorist training camps in that country have been destroyed or at least disrupted. No terrorist training camps in Afghanistan = safer world.

These are three very clear indications that the world is a safer place. There are many more as well, but for the sake of brevity I will not go further with this defense.

You also claim that Al Qaeda hasn't been destroyed. It hasn't been eradicated, but when you consider that 75% of its leaders and members are either dead or in prison, I think that you are being a little unfair to claim that the war on terror hasn't been effective against this terrorist group.

The only thing in that list that has yet to be "ticked off" is the capture of Osama Bin Laden, and I believe that we will be seeing that accomplished in the next 6 months if he isn't already dead as a hammer.

You say that there is more terror throughout the world now. I don't believe that. There have been a few high profile cases - such as what occurred in Spain and what recently happened in Egypt and Russia, but terrorists have been doing this for years. It just hasn't made the headlines. If, though, you are right and the attacks have stepped up, it is because the war on terror is working, not because it is failing.

In spite of your denials, Iraq WAS as sanctuary for terrorists. The biggest of all were Saddam and his two sons. But as I mentioned earlier Abu Nidal resided there, and, from what I have heard, so did Al Zarkawi. I think that Ann Coulter also made a good point in the article that I linked to yesterday. Al Qaeda is operating in 60 countries around the world, and yet somehow I'm supposed to believe that they AREN'T operating in Iraq? Right. And, for a country that wasn't sponsoring terrorists, there sure are alot operating there NOW.

If it is true that there were no WMDs in Iraq (and frankly I am not yet willing to concede that point) then it wasn't only US and British intelligence that was faulty. There were a whole lot of countries around the world that held the same opinion (including France.) The coalition made its decision based on the best intel that it had, and regardless of whether the intel was completely correct, the decision was still the correct one to make, as we have seen from the report that I mentioned earlier. Saddam would have come out a whole lot better if he had actually cooperated with the UN weapons inspectors. Instead, he chose to play games that gave every appearance that he was attempting to prevent the inspectors from doing their jobs properly. I don't think that was merely a game for Saddam. I believe that there really was something that he was trying to hide.

Unfortunately, Israel does have the experience and expertise to deal with these terrorists. I don't think that it is a lack of expertise on Israel's part to work out a peace deal with the "palestinians." Israel has been willing to give away far more that I think that it should be willing to give up any number of times. Israel has been more than willing to make the first move for peace. And EVERY SINGLE TIME that they have the "palestinians" have broken faith with the Israelis through terrorist acts. I lay the sole responsibility for the failure to achieve peace in Israel and to achieve statehood for the "palestinians" at Yassir Arafat's feet. The blood of thousands is upon him, and I would not want to be him when he finally does die and go to meet God. Justice will then be served.

I believe that you misread my comments regarding the situation in Iran. I do not think that the US or the Coalition will need to go into Iran. I agree with you that the opposition in that country is doing very nicely, and I hope that they will be able to overthrow this backwards regime. It would be even better if they can do it peacefully. However, if it cannot there may come a time when those in opposition to the current government in Iran may need the military assistance (on any number of different levels) of the Coalition to bring down the current regime. I was merely pointing out that due to what I believe is the strategy on the war on terror that we are well placed to lend that assistance if it is required. I really don't think that much assistance will be required at all to be honest. That is why I believe that the US approach to Iran has been very different to the one that it has taken in Afghanistan and Iraq.

I am glad that you see the US as a protagonist in the war on terror. I truly believe that we are, and I totally believe that our motives are pure. We are seeking our security, and we don't mind helping others secure their own. The US has always been this way. I do, however, believe that you have been drawing from too many media sources with an axe to grind. From what I have seen of the President and of his character, I do not believe for one minute that he has it in him to attempt a boldfaced lie to the World or the American people. He is a moral man, and is honorable. I would not say this of the former President, because he was VERY capable of lying, and did so to the American people under oath. If President Bush propagated an untruth, it is because the information that he was given was faulty - not because he willfully deceived anyone.

Anonymous said...

Despite your faith on the president words, the world never was a safe place and probably never will be. Maybe you feel safer in your neighborhood but I wouldn't say the same for the rest of the world. What are we talking about?

Supposedly there are no more terrorist training camps in Afghanistan but, as you said, Al Qaeda is still operating in more than 60 countries. It is not a parnoid theory and it's important to understand the real nature of the fundamentalism and islamic terrorism. Most of the islamic terrorist comes from madrassas guided by religious leaders in Saudi Arabia, Egypt, Paquistan, even London, and they do not fight for a country, they figh alone (or small groups) in a holly war. Yeah, using high profile cases. They do not need a state to exist. Ok?

I mean, of course it's correct to fight against terrorism but Iraq has focused in nothing but the chaos after the first battle. Got Saddam but what else? Now there is more terrorist and terrorism in Iraq.

Ah....ok! Lybia agreed.

Jonathan said...

For someone who seems to be agreeing with me, you are awfully argumentative! First of all, let me quote my last response, "As the President said, it isn't safe yet, but it is SAFER." If you look above, I NEVER claimed that the world is a safe place. Since before Adam ate the forbidden fruit, the world has not been a safe place. It has grown less and less safe ever since then. However, I must say that I believe that we are much safer attacking the terrorists than we would be waiting for them to attack us. The world won't be a safe place until Jesus comes back.

I think that the situation in Iraq is chaotic for the very reasons that the President has said. Islamic fundamentalists do not want to see the mission to liberate Iraq succeed. They know that it will provide a strategic outpost of freedom there in the Middle East that will compromise their agenda to bring the world under the totalitarian boot of their shariah. Besides that, the people creating the chaos in Iraq are doing what their religion tells them to do - kill everyone that disagrees with them, regardless of whether they are Muslims, Americans, Christians, or children.

Iraq isn't the only place where the war on terror is being waged either - it just happens to be the hot spot. There is alot going on behind the scenes all over the world to root out these terrorist groups, regardless of whether they call themselves Al Qaeda, Hamas, or the IRA.